Original Research Articles

Plasma CGRP but not PACAP-38 concentrations are associated with response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 26 November 2025
189
Views
62
Downloads

Authors

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have revolutionized migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to these therapies, highlighting an urgent need for predictive biomarkers. This study investigates whether baseline plasma levels of CGRP or pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP)-38 may predict the clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM).

Methods: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted on migraine patients treated with erenumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab. Clinical outcomes, including monthly migraine days (MMD), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and monthly medication intake (MMI), were assessed at baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), and 6 months (T2). A group of healthy subjects was used as controls. Plasma CGRP and PACAP-38 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Treatment responses were tested using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: 30 females, 7 males (17 HFEM, 20 CM), and 16 healthy controls were included in the study. Baseline plasma CGRP and PACAP-38 concentrations were higher in migraine patients than in controls (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Baseline CGRP levels significantly correlated with worse clinical outcomes at 6 months: higher CGRP was associated with greater MMD (r=0.470, p=0.003), MIDAS scores (r=0.601, p<0.001), and MMI (r=0.410, p=0.010) at T2. Additionally, higher baseline CGRP levels were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving a ≥50% reduction in MIDAS scores. Multivariate regression confirmed that elevated CGRP independently predicted poorer response, particularly in CM patients. Conversely, PACAP-38 levels did not emerge as significant predictors of any clinical outcome measures.

Conclusions: Our study shows that higher baseline plasma CGRP levels predict a reduced clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs in patients with HFEM and CM after 6 months, supporting CGRP as a potential biomarker for treatment stratification. PACAP-38 levels did not influence treatment outcomes, indicating a distinct role in migraine pathophysiology. These results encourage further research into personalized treatment approaches based on neuropeptide profiling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Olesen J. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202
2. Amiri P, Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Mohammadinasab R, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, et al. Migraine: A Review on Its History, Global Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Comorbidities. Front Neurol 2022;12:1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.800605
3. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
4. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nat Rev Neurol 2023;19:109-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00763-1
5. Bonafede M, Sapra S, Shah N, Tepper S, Cappell K, Desai P. Direct and Indirect Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Migraine Patients in the United States. Headache J Head Face Pain 2018;58:700-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13275
6. Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Vo P, Ritrovato D, Reilly MC, Naclerio M, et al. Healthcare resource use and indirect costs associated with migraine in Italy: results from the My Migraine Voice survey. J Med Econ 2021;24:717-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2021.1925557
7. Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Özge A, et al. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet 2021;397:1485-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7
8. Ashina M, Terwindt GM, Al-Karagholi MA, de Boer I, Lee MJ, Hay DL, et al. Migraine: disease characterisation, biomarkers, and precision medicine. Lancet 2021;397:1496-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32162-0
9. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies — successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 2018;14:338-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1
10. Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2113-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709038
11. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, et al. Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine. JAMA 2018;319:1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.4853
12. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, et al. A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2123-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705848
13. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1080-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212
14. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology 2018;91:e2211-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640
15. Alpuente A, Torres-Ferrus M, Terwindt GM. Preventive CGRP-targeted therapies for chronic migraine with and without medication-overuse headache. Cephalalgia 2023;43:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221150235
16. Ashina M, Lanteri-Minet M, Ettrup A, Christoffersen CL, Josiassen MK, Phul R, et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures: subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled DELIVER study. Cephalalgia 2023;43:3331024231170807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231170807
17. Cernuda-Morollón E, Larrosa D, Ramón C, Vega J, Martínez-Camblor P, Pascual J. Interictal increase of CGRP levels in peripheral blood as a biomarker for chronic migraine. Neurology 2013:81:1191-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a6cb72
18. Cernuda-Morollón E, Ramón C, Martínez-Camblor P, Serrano-Pertierra E, Larrosa D, Pascual J. OnabotulinumtoxinA decreases interictal CGRP plasma levels in patients with chronic migraine. Pain 2015;156:820-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000119
19. Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Asskour L, Caronna E, Torres-Ferrus M, Pozo-Rosich P. Salivary CGRP and Erenumab Treatment Response: Towards Precision Medicine in Migraine. Ann Neurol 2022;92:846-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26472
20. Gárate G, González-Quintanilla V, González A, Pascual M, Pérez-Pereda S, Madera J, Pascual J. Serum Alpha and Beta-CGRP Levels in Chronic Migraine Patients Before and After Monoclonal Antibodies Against CGRP or its Receptor. Ann Neurol 2023;94:285-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26658
21. Vaudry D, Falluel-Morel A, Bourgault S, Basille M, Burel D, Wurtz O, et al. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and its receptors: 20 Years after the discovery. Pharmacol Rev 2009;61:283-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.109.001370
22. Guo S, Jansen-Olesen I, Olesen J, Christensen SL. Role of PACAP in migraine: An alternative to CGRP? Neurobiol Dis 2023;176:105946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105946
23. Romozzi M, Di Nardo L, Trigila V, Cuffaro G, Savino G, Iannone LF, et al. CGRP increase in tear fluid of migraine patients is reversed by anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2025;96:914-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-335868
24. Messlinger K, Vogler B, Kuhn A, Sertel-Nakajima J, Frank F, Broessner G. CGRP measurements in human plasma - a methodological study. Cephalalgia 2021;41:1359-73.
25. Lee MJ, Lee SY, Cho S, Kang ES, Chung CS. Feasibility of serum CGRP measurement as a biomarker of chronic migraine: A critical reappraisal. J Headache Pain 2018;19:53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0883-x
26. Tuka B, Helyes Z, Markovics A, Bagoly T, Szolcsányi J, Szabó N, et al. Alterations in PACAP-38-like immunoreactivity in the plasma during ictal and interictal periods of migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2013;33:1085-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413483931
27. Liu J, Wang G, Dan Y, Liu X. CGRP and PACAP-38 play an important role in diagnosing pediatric migraine. J Headache Pain 2021;22:79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01435-7
28. Sreevani N, Ramesh B, Maheshkumar K, Thanalakshmi J. Comparative analysis of CGRP, VIP and PACAP-38 levels in migraine with and without aura: a case–control study. J Headache Pain 2024;25:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251340156
29. Ernstsen C, Christensen SL, Rasmussen RH, Nielsen BS, Jansen-Olesen I, Olesen J, Kristensen DM. The PACAP path-way is independent of CGRP in mouse models of migraine: possible new drug target? Brain 2022;145:2450-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac040
30. Ashina M, Phul R, Khodaie M, Löf E, Florea I. A Monoclonal Antibody to PACAP for Migraine Prevention. N Engl J Med 2024;391:800-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314577
31. Kuburas A, Russo AF. Shared and independent roles of CGRP and PACAP in migraine pathophysiology. J Headache Pain 2023;24:34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01569-2
32. D’Amico D, Mosconi P, Genco S, Usai S, Prudenzano AM, Grazzi L, et al. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire: Translation and Reliability of the Italian Version. Cephalalgia 2001;21:947-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0333-1024.2001.00277.x
33. Messlinger K, Vogler B, Kuhn A, Sertel-Nakajima J, Frank F, Broessner G. CGRP measurements in human plasma - a methodological study. Cephalalgia 2021;41:1359-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211024161

Supporting Agencies

The study was funded by grants from the Italian Ministry of University (MUR), the “Departments of Excellence 2023-2027” project to the Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, and the “Ricerca Locale 2023” grant to ER.

How to Cite



1.
Plasma CGRP but not PACAP-38 concentrations are associated with response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine. Confinia Cephalal [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 26 [cited 2026 Jan. 30];35(2). Available from: https://www.confiniacephalalgica.com/site/article/view/15790