SISC-Poster
2025: 39° Conference of the Italian Society for the Study of Headaches (SISC)

PO-44 | Effectiveness of fremanezumab as preventive treatment of migraine up to 24 months: response rates from the Italian analysis of the PEARL study

Alberto Doretti,1 Anna Ambrosini,2 Simone Braca,3 Florindo D’Onofrio,4 Elisa Maria Piella,5 Pinar Kokturk,6 Rosario Iannacchero7 | 1Department of Neurology-Laboratory of Neuroscience, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy; 2Mediterranean Neurological Institute NEUROMED IRCCS, Pozzilli (IS), Italy; 3Headache Centre, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy; 4UOSD Stroke Unit, S.G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy; 5Neurosciences Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 6Teva Netherlands B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands; 7Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Regional Hospital “Pugliese-Ciaccio”, Catanzaro, Italy

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 17 October 2025
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Background: Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway with proven efficacy as preventive treatment of episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). In Italy, fremanezumab reimbursement for preventive treatment of migraine is available for ≤12 months in individuals who meet Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) criteria (≥8 monthly migraine days [MMD], a Migraine Disability Assessment score of ≥11 points before treatment and experience of ≥3 other preventive treatment failures). Here, we report long-term effectiveness of fremanezumab for migraine prevention over 24 months in Italian participants enrolled in the Phase 4, non-interventional, observational Pan-European Real Life (PEARL; EUPAS35111) study.

 

Methods: Eligible participants had EM or CM at enrolment. Primary endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving ≥50% reduction in MMD during 6 months after first dose of fremanezumab. A mandatory ≥1-month treatment discontinuation period occurred following 12 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included: proportion of participants achieving ≥50%, ≥75% or 100% reduction in MMD at Months 3, 12 and 24 and change from baseline in MMD at Months 3, 12 and 24.

 

Results: Overall, 354 (EM, 125; CM, 229) eligible participants were enrolled in 30 centres. In total, 61.9% of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD during the 6 months after fremanezumab initiation. A sustained response was observed over 24 months: 61.2%, 35.7% and 10.5% of participants achieved ≥50%, ≥75% or 100% reduction in MMD at Month 3 (n=353), respectively; 62.1%, 38.5% and 14.5% achieved ≥50%, ≥75% or 100% reduction in MMD at Month 12 (n=351), respectively; and 58.5%, 43.9% and 7.3% achieved ≥50%, ≥75% or 100% reduction in MMD at Month 24 (n=41), respectively. Only participants with EM (17.6%) achieved a complete response at Month 24. Mean change from baseline in MMD was –8.2 at Month 1, –9.3 at Month 12 and –10.5 at Month 24. Overall, 24.9% (88/354) of participants discontinued the study (lack of efficacy, 34.1%; lost to follow-up, 20.5%; participant withdrawal, 13.6%; non-compliance, 9.1%).

 

Conclusion: Although many participants in this study interrupted fremanezumab for ≥1 month due to AIFA requirement, these results indicate that fremanezumab is effective for migraine prevention over 24 months.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

No refs

How to Cite



1.
PO-44 | Effectiveness of fremanezumab as preventive treatment of migraine up to 24 months: response rates from the Italian analysis of the PEARL study: Alberto Doretti,1 Anna Ambrosini,2 Simone Braca,3 Florindo D’Onofrio,4 Elisa Maria Piella,5 Pinar Kokturk,6 Rosario Iannacchero7 | 1Department of Neurology-Laboratory of Neuroscience, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy; 2Mediterranean Neurological Institute NEUROMED IRCCS, Pozzilli (IS), Italy; 3Headache Centre, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy; 4UOSD Stroke Unit, S.G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy; 5Neurosciences Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 6Teva Netherlands B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands; 7Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Regional Hospital “Pugliese-Ciaccio”, Catanzaro, Italy. Confinia Cephalal [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 17 [cited 2025 Oct. 20];. Available from: https://www.confiniacephalalgica.com/site/article/view/15866