SISC-Poster
2025: 39° Conference of the Italian Society for the Study of Headaches (SISC)

PO-62 | Preventive migraine treatment in patients under 25: a 24-month observational study on adherence, therapeutic switching, and prescription determinant factors

Marilena Marcosano,1 Nicoletta Brunelli,1 Luisa Fofi,1 Laura Papetti,2 Fabiana Ursitti,2 Massimiliano Valeriani,2 Fabrizio Vernieri,1 Claudia Altamura1 | 1Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Biomedico di Rome, Rome, Italy; 2Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 17 October 2025
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Background: This retrospective cohort study investigated young migraine patients (<25 years) to evaluate patterns of oral and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb) prescriptions, follow-up adherence, and monthly migraine day (MMD) trends. It aimed to identify clinical factors associated with follow-up dropout, mAb usage, and migraine worsening.

Methods: The study included 383 migraine patients (77.8% female; mean age: 20.8 years) followed at the Headache Center of the Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Rome. Non-migraine headaches were excluded. For patients with >8 MMDs, mAb efficacy was assessed by a ≥50% MMD reduction (RR50). Statistical analysis (SPSS) employed logistic regression and chi-square tests to identify predictors of follow-up loss, mAb prescription, and treatment response.

Results: At baseline, patients reported an average of 10.9 MMDs and commonly used NSAIDs (75.7%) for acute treatment, while triptans were underused (5.7%). Preventive therapy had never been used by 62.2% of the cohort; only 18.1% had tried a single preventive regimen. Frequent comorbidities included neuropsychiatric and gynecological conditions. Photophobia was the most common symptom, and stress was the leading trigger. After the initial evaluation, 85.4% were prescribed a preventive treatment—most frequently tricyclic antidepressants (29.2%) and nutraceuticals (21.4%). During follow-up, oral preventives decreased, while advanced therapies like botulinum toxin and mAbs remained stable. Shorter migraine history and fewer MMDs at baseline were significantly associated with dropout from follow-up (p<0.01). mAb treatment for at least six months increased the likelihood of achieving RR50 (OR 2.51, p=0.01), with a better response in males (OR 0.443, p=0.035 for females). Early initiation of mAbs led to more pronounced reductions in migraine burden, although some residual disease persisted.

Conclusion: This young migraine cohort displayed a high burden of disease and comorbidities. Over time, patients tended to adopt more specific acute treatments. Those with milder baseline disease were less likely to adhere to follow-up. Early mAb therapy was more effective in reducing migraine frequency, especially in females, but late intervention resulted in similar minimal MMD levels to those seen with oral therapies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

No refs

How to Cite



1.
PO-62 | Preventive migraine treatment in patients under 25: a 24-month observational study on adherence, therapeutic switching, and prescription determinant factors: Marilena Marcosano,1 Nicoletta Brunelli,1 Luisa Fofi,1 Laura Papetti,2 Fabiana Ursitti,2 Massimiliano Valeriani,2 Fabrizio Vernieri,1 Claudia Altamura1 | 1Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Biomedico di Rome, Rome, Italy; 2Developmental Neurology, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Confinia Cephalal [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 17 [cited 2025 Oct. 20];. Available from: https://www.confiniacephalalgica.com/site/article/view/15885